Al-Ta’rif bi Awham man Qassama ‘l-Sunan ila Sahih wa Da’if by Mahmud Sa’id Mamduh

A well-known rebuttal of Shaykh Nasir al-Din al-Albani’s critique of the four Sunan works, this six-volume work is very useful for the hadith researcher.

The pdf of the book can be found at the following link:

http://narjes-library.blogspot.com/2011/05/blog-post_578.html

8 thoughts on “Al-Ta’rif bi Awham man Qassama ‘l-Sunan ila Sahih wa Da’if by Mahmud Sa’id Mamduh

  1. The author has strong Shiite inclinations. He is a student of the Ghumari shaykhs and is quite harsh in his tone. His works are to be taken with a large tablespoon of salt.

  2. The book was recently uploaded by Shia. There are number of refutations written of this book. The first one, i guess, was by Amr Abdul Mun’im. But that is not available online. Following are some of the refutations available online

    Talee’ah Fiqh Al-Isnad wa kashf haqeeq Mu’taridh ‘ala A’immah An-Nuqad, Pages-112
    By Shaykh Tariq AwadhAllah
    http://www.waqfeya.com/book.php?bid=4939

    Ta’reef Uli An-Nuha wa Al-Ahlaam bi ma fee Ta’reef Mamduh min Al-Akhta’ wa Al-Awham, pages-896
    By Abdullah bin Ubud Ba Humraan
    http://majles.alukah.net/showthread.php?t=81151

    Ahkam Al-Hadeed ala Mahmud Sa’eed, pages-554
    By Abdul Fattah Mahmud Sarur
    http://www.waqfeya.com/book.php?bid=6416

  3. He’s not a shi’ah in the twelver sense, nor even in a zaydi sense. Rather he makes tafdil of sayyiduna ‘Ali over the shaykhayn [ridhwan Allah ‘alayhim ajma’in]. Yes, not all his views are correct, but nor are the salafi views espoused in the books linked to by ‘Muhammad Moin’.

    was-salam

  4. Assalamu’alaikum…
    Well, tafdheel is not the only issue with him. There is a paper published in the famous refutation of fabricated juz of Musannaf Abdur Razzaq, by Ziyad at-Tukla. It is at the end of this refutation. According to it, several students, and they signed it, witnessed Mahmud Saeed’s speech in which he reviled even senior Sahaba, including mother Aisha (R.A.). Besides that, he often attack Ahle Sunnah for so called bias against shia and so called love for Nasibis. His books are quite evident in this regard. Anyways that is another thing irrelevant to this blog content. His books are useful to a good extant for a student of hadith, but as a critique of al-Albani then it is full of deceptions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s